Threat intelligence automation should be how we share, not how “Intel” is produced.
Threat intelligence automation should be how we share, not how “Intel” is produced.
Yet, we continue to create more data - generate more noise - introduce more false positive - require more analysis - increase the need for correlation - which, in turn, forces the need for more automation.
Guests
CyberSquarePeg (aka Rebecca Ford)
On Twitter 👉 https://twitter.com/CyberSquarePeg
Andy Piazza
On Twitter 👉 https://twitter.com/klrgrz
On Linkedin 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/in/andypiazza/
This Episode’s Sponsors
Imperva: https://itspm.ag/imperva277117988
Archer: https://itspm.ag/rsaarchweb
Edgescan: https://itspm.ag/itspegweb
____________________________
Resources
What's Wrong with Cyber Threat Intelligence: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2020.1780062
CTI is Better Served with Context: Getting better value from IOCs: https://klrgrz.medium.com/cti-is-better-served-with-context-getting-better-value-from-iocs-496343741f80
Considerations for Leveraging Cyber Threat Feeds Effectively: https://klrgrz.medium.com/considerations-for-leveraging-cyber-threat-feeds-effectively-1d1cfa9fb140
Inspiring tweet thread: https://twitter.com/klrgrz/status/1382412354063831040
____________________________
To see and hear more podcasts and webcasts about Redefining CyberSecurity for your business, tune in to ITSPmagazine at:
https://www.itspmagazine.com/redefining-cybersecurity
Are you interested in advertising on ITSPmagazine?
👉 https://www.itspmagazine.com/sponsorship-introduction
Are you interested in sponsoring an ITSPmagazine podcast?
👉 https://www.itspmagazine.com/podcast-series-sponsorships